2025 MOT results

Audi Q2 common problems

The most common reason a Audi Q2 fails its MOT is a cut tyre, on 16.2% of its 8,367 failed tests in 2025. Against other cars of the same age, 4 faults stand out, the widest gaps being: worn brake discs at 3.8% of failures against 2.1% expected; worn brake pads at 16.1% of failures against 9.5% expected; washers that do not work at 3.8% of failures against 2.3% expected.

Last updated
Records analysed
84,605 MOT tests
Methodology
View methodology

What fails a Audi Q2 MOT

Each bar is the share of failed Audi Q2 tests with that defect. Where we can compare it with cars of the same registration years, the marker shows what an average car of those ages records (12 of the 12 items below).

Most common reasons for failure

A test can fail for more than one defect, so shares add up to more than 100%.

Specific defects on failed Audi Q2 MOT tests, 2025, with the share for cars of the same registration years
Defect Share of failed tests
Tyres: cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres 16.2%
Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes 16.1%
Tyres: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres 15.6%
Washers: provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility 5.2%
Tyres: ply or cords exposed Tyres 4.7%
Headlamp aim: too low Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 4.4%
Headlamp aim: too high Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 4.4%
Brake discs: significantly and obviously worn Brakes 3.8%
Washers: not working Visibility 3.8%
Tyres: tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres 3.7%
Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility 3.4%
Tyre pressure monitoring system: malfunctioning or obviously inoperative Tyres 3.2%

Source:DVSA,UK Motoring analysis 2025 Updated

  • Cut tyre

    16.2% of failures 11.2% expected somewhat more often

    A cut in the tyre deep or long enough to reach the structure underneath, usually from a kerb or debris.

    Run a hand round the inner and outer walls of each tyre, which is where kerbing shows.

  • Worn brake pads

    16.1% of failures 9.5% expected 1.7 times as often

    Friction material worn under 1.5mm, thinner than the point most manufacturers call the limit.

    Look through the wheel spokes at the pad against the disc; wear indicators squeal before they get this far.

  • Tyre worn below the legal limit

    15.6% of failures 10.7% expected 1.5 times as often

    A tyre worn past the 1.6mm legal minimum across the middle three quarters of the tread.

    A 20p coin in the main grooves: if the outer band of the coin is visible, the tyre is close to the limit.

  • Washers that do not work

    5.2% of failures 4.8% expected about as expected

    The washers cannot deliver enough liquid to clean the windscreen with the wipers.

    Top the bottle up and check both jets reach the glass; the pump is often fine and the jet blocked.

  • Tyre worn through to the cords

    4.7% of failures 6.8% expected somewhat less often

    The tyre is worn or damaged far enough to expose the cords underneath, which is a dangerous defect.

    Run a hand round the inner and outer walls of each tyre, which is where kerbing shows.

  • Headlamp aim set too low

    4.4% of failures 4.3% expected about as expected

    The dipped beam points lower than it should, so it lights too little of the road.

    Nothing to do at the roadside, but a garage resets the aim in minutes; a sagging suspension corner or a heavy boot load can throw it out.

Which parts of the car fail

Tyres is the area that most often fails a Audi Q2, on 44.1% of failed tests. That is also where it differs most from cars of the same registration years, which record 35.7%.

Failure categories

DVSA's own sections of the test. The marker is what cars of the same registration years record.

Share of failed Audi Q2 MOT tests with at least one defect in each category, 2025
Defect category Share of failed tests
Tyres 44.1%
Brakes 23.4%
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.8%
Visibility 13.6%
Suspension 5.5%
Noise, emissions and leaks 4.4%
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 3.1%
Road wheels 1.9%

Source:DVSA,UK Motoring analysis 2025 Updated

What testers warn about

39.7% of Audi Q2 tests ended with at least one advisory: a fault the tester found that did not fail the test. On Audi Q2s, these are the items to ask about on a car you are viewing, because they are what the last tester expected to go next.

Most common advisories

Share of all tests, passes included.

Most common MOT advisories on Audi Q2 tests, 2025
Advisory Share of tests
Tread depth: worn close to legal limit or worn on edge Tyres 13.5%
Tyres: slightly damaged or cracking or perishing Tyres 11.6%
Brake pads: wearing thin Brakes 11.5%
Brake discs: worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Brakes 8.1%
Nail in tyre Non-component advisories 3.0%
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt Non-component advisories 2.9%
Shock absorbers: light misting of oil Suspension 2.6%
Brake discs: worn, but not excessively Brakes 2.2%
Tyres: cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres 1.8%
Registration plates: deteriorated but not likely to be misread Identification of the vehicle 1.0%
Items removed from driver's view prior to test Non-component advisories 0.8%
Tyres: slightly damaged Tyres 0.5%

Source:DVSA,UK Motoring analysis 2025 Updated

Audi Q2 problems: common questions

What is the most common problem with a Audi Q2?

Of the faults that fail an MOT, “Tyres: cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords” is the most common: it appears on 16.2% of failed Audi Q2 tests. Across categories, tyres is the area that most often fails one, on 44.1% of failed tests.

How often does a Audi Q2 fail its MOT?

9.9% of Audi Q2 tests in 2025 were not passed first time, from 84,605 tests of cars aged three and over. Allowing for the age and mileage of the cars tested, that gives it a UK Motoring Reliability Score of 67 out of 100, where 50 is as expected.

Does anything fail more often on a Audi Q2 than on other cars?

Yes. “Brake discs: significantly and obviously worn” appears on 3.8% of its failures against 2.1% for cars of the same age, and “Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick” appears on 16.1% of its failures against 9.5% for cars of the same age. Where an item is missing from the national figures for a year, we use the smallest share those figures show, so the comparison never overstates the difference.

Are these the same as breakdowns or known faults?

No. These are the items a tester recorded at the MOT, which covers condition and safety: lamps, brakes, tyres, suspension, corrosion and emissions. A gearbox that is unpleasant, an infotainment screen that has died, or a car that will not start on a cold morning are not part of the test, so they are not in these figures.

Where do the figures come from?

Every normal MOT test of a Audi Q2 aged three and over in Great Britain in 2025, from DVSA's anonymised MOT results. Retests are excluded, and the same fault on more than one wheel counts once.

Data stories to read next

All insights

Data sources and methodology

Datasets used on this page
Figures Source Period Records Updated
MOT defects and advisories Anonymised MOT tests and results Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency
Derived statistics UK Motoring
2025 84,605 MOT tests 19 September 2026
  • Shares for defects are of failed tests; shares for advisories are of all tests. A test can carry several defects, so shares add to more than 100%.
  • The expected share is what an average car of the same registration years records, weighted by where this model’s failures fall. Where an item is outside the national figures for a year, the smallest share those figures show is used in its place, which is an upper bound, so the comparison never overstates a model’s problems. No expectation is published where less than 80% of the model’s failures can be compared.
  • Great Britain only: DVSA does not run MOT testing in Northern Ireland. Cars under three years old are not tested.
  • The descriptions of what each part does are general and the same on every model. Every figure comes from the MOT data.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.